01
Evidence before claims
A qualification, an experience record, a facility credential and a registration each answer a different question. Source, date and reviewer matter.
Trust and accountability
Clear evidence. Named responsibility. A correction path for the professional. These principles guide every part of the AEZI model, and they are published before the product exists.
Four principles
01
A qualification, an experience record, a facility credential and a registration each answer a different question. Source, date and reviewer matter.
02
Institutions need defensible processes. Professionals need fair treatment, correction rights and clear accountability.
03
AI can assist with extraction, coordination and review preparation. Hiring, privileges and adverse findings require accountable human review.
04
Portable evidence helps explain readiness. It does not replace a regulator, a visa decision or an institution's credentialing committee.
Three states
When AEZI operates this work, each element carries one of three states. Pending is not a pass, and an adverse result is escalated to a person.
A self-statement, labelled as one.
With a date, and a reviewer.
Not a pass. Not a fail. Visible.
Availability
AEZI welcomes professional, institutional and partnership enquiries. The professional dossier, employer workspace and wider lifecycle services are planned capabilities. They are not open for general use on this website.
Questions worth asking
No. The model extends beyond recruitment into credential readiness, contracting, protection, development and assurance. This public site takes enquiries, not applications for clinical posts, and lists no live vacancies.
No. Registration belongs to the relevant regulator and clinical privileges belong to the responsible institution. AEZI's planned role is to organise evidence and make readiness gaps visible.
No. Please use the contact page for a first enquiry and do not send licences, identity documents or anything about a patient. Document collection will require a controlled workspace with its own access and privacy arrangements.
To assist with repetitive work such as extraction, classification, chasing missing items, preparing reviews and watching expiries. Hiring, privileging and adverse findings stay with accountable people.
No. They belong to the wider roadmap. Delivery models and authorised partners must be established before any of those services are offered.
The model is designed for regulated healthcare professions and begins from India. Pathway pages are planning frameworks, not eligibility decisions, and requirements vary by profession, destination and date.
Write to the desk. We would rather be asked than assumed.